Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lewie Lane vs Patrick Zahraj Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lane vs Zahraj analysis and find out who is favored!
Lewie Lane vs Patrick Zahraj Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lane 1 - 0 Zahraj
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lane has won 48.22% of points on his second serve, while Zahraj has won 44.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lane, in recent form, has won 46.18% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zahraj has won 54.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.27% and 35.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lane has saved 58.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zahraj has saved 55.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lane has won 55.32% of matches played (W/L 26/ 21), with Zahraj winning 61.43% (W/L 43/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lane has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 10/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 32% (W/L 8/ 17). Zahraj has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 48/ 34), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Lane has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 25/ 20), where as Zahraj has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.32% of matches (W/L 43/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lane winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lane winning 2 and Zahraj winning 1. The last match between Lane and Zahraj was at the M15 Szczawno, 01-09-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Lewie Lane getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lane and Zahraj have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lane winning 1 times and Zahraj 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lane winning 0, and Zahraj 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lane has played against opponents with an average rank of 127.79 while Zahraj has played against players with an average rank of 119.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lane has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zahraj has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lane has converted 43.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zahraj has converted 41.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
742
Rank
709
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
777
Rank
777
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
55% (78-64)
Career Total W/L
58% (85-62)
36% (5-9)
YTD W/L
58% (15-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lewie Lane | Patrick Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:36:0 | 2:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (67/98) | 63% (58/92) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (43/67) | 57% (33/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (16/31) | 53% (18/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 23% (3/13) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (41/92) | 40% (39/98) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Lewie Lane
Player
Patrick Zahraj
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lewie Lane | Patrick Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 36% (5/9) | 58% (15/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 37% (11/19) | 55% (33/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (135/149) | 53% (309/278) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 57% (4/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 38% (3/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 40 | 125 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.44 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 128 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:30 | 1:46:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 148.43 | 158.65 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (568/906) | 60% (1082/1792) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (385/568) | 68% (737/1082) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (163/338) | 45% (321/710) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (30/69) | 43% (84/197) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (328/893) | 43% (769/1807) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 36% (5/9) | 60% (15/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 36% (5/14) | 58% (15/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 56% (5/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (5/5) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (5/0) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 25% (12/3) |
Lewie Lane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Lewie Lane
47%
(
18 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
18 of
30)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
45
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lewie Lane
Player
Yannik Kelm
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Lewie Lane
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bogdan Pavel
Player
Lewie Lane
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lewie Lane
Player
Henry Searle
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simon Beaupain
Player
Lewie Lane
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Lewie Lane
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lewie Lane
Player
Jacopo Bilardo
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Lewie Lane
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lewie Lane
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Patrick Zahraj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Patrick Zahraj
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Michele Ribecai
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
58 of
109)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mariano Tammaro
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
94
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Patrick Zahraj
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Patrick Zahraj
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
12
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Vincent Marysko
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Matyas Cerny
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
1
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
3
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Patrick Zahraj
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Arthur Nagel
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
5
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Patrick Zahraj
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
26
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
84%
(
58 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
30%
(
32 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lane Vs Zahraj Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Patrick Zahraj
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
